Branden Berns and Ryan Murr are the authors of “The Current Landscape of Reverse Mergers: An In-Depth Analysis and Q&A” [PDF] published by DealLawyers.com on April 2, 2025.
M&A
Webcast: M&A Insights: Earn-Outs, New HSR and Investment Rules, and Fraud Liability
Join us for a 45-minute briefing covering several M&A practice topics. The program is part of a series of quarterly webcasts designed to provide quick insights into emerging issues and practical advice on how to manage common M&A problems. Steve Glover, a partner in the firm’s Global M&A Practice Group, acts as moderator.
Federal Circuit Decision in Allergan v. MSN
On August 13, 2024, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision on the issue of obviousness-type double patenting (ODP) and patent-term adjustment (PTA) in Allergan USA, Inc. et al., v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd., et al., No. 24-1061 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 13, 2024). While the decision also addressed other issues, this update focuses on summarizing the Court’s holding on the ODP issue.
Delaware Court of Chancery Opines on Meaning of ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’ in Pharmaceutical Earn-Out Provision
Ryan Murr, Karen Spindler, Todd Trattner, Marina Szteinbok and Artin Au-Yeung are the authors of “Delaware Court of Chancery Opines on Meaning of ‘Commercially Reasonable Efforts’ in Pharmaceutical Earn-Out Provision” [PDF] published by the Deal Lawyers in its May-June 2024 issue.
Delaware Court of Chancery Opines on the Meaning of “Commercially Reasonable Efforts” in a Pharmaceutical Earn-Out Provision
Observations and drafting suggestions for CRE terms in merger agreements, licenses, and royalty purchase agreements.
On April 30, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that the buyer in a life sciences merger and its successor had not breached their contractual obligations under an earn-out provision to use commercially reasonable efforts (“CRE”) to achieve regulatory approvals for a pharmaceutical product. In Himawan, et al. v. Cephalon, Inc., et al., Vice Chancellor Glasscock found that the merger agreement’s definition of CRE for purposes of the earn-out provision, which referred to the efforts of a company with substantially the same resources and expertise as the buyer, required the Court to analyze whether a reasonable actor faced with the circumstances would continue to pursue the development of a drug that had failed to meet one of its co-primary endpoints in an earlier clinical trial.[1]
Behind The ‘CVR Spin’ Method Of Unlocking Assets In M&A
San Francisco partner Ryan Murr, Washington, D.C. partner Stephen Glover and San Francisco partner Branden Berns are the authors of “Behind The ‘CVR Spin’ Method Of Unlocking Assets In M&A” [PDF] published by Law360 on March 11, 2024.
OpEd: How to Get Value for Non-Core Assets With CVR Spinoffs
Ryan Murr, Stephen Glover and Branden Berns are the authors of “OpEd: How to Get Value for Non-Core Assets With CVR Spinoffs” published by The Deal on March 7, 2024.