• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Biotech Briefings

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

Trump’s 100% Pharma Tariffs: Manageable for Large Pharma; Challenging for Biotechs

September 26, 2025 | Posted by Ryan A. Murr; Pamela Lawrence Endreny; Terrell Ussing; Karen A. Spindler; Branden C. Berns; Melanie E. Neary; Ryan Rott; Topic(s): Government Regulation; International Trade; Trends and Insights

On September 25, 2025, President Trump announced 100% tariffs on imported branded or patented pharmaceuticals, effective October 1, 2025, unless the importing company is building U.S. manufacturing capacity (defined in President Trump’s announcement as “breaking ground and/or under construction”). The policy is being advanced under Section 232 “national security” authority.

Read More

White House, HHS, and FDA Launch a “Crackdown” on “Deceptive” Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertising

September 11, 2025 | Posted by Carlo Felizardo; Katlin McKelvie Topic(s): FDA

The White House, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have announced that FDA has initiated “sweeping reforms” and “aggressive enforcement” to address “deceptive” and “misleading” direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising.

Read More

What Life Sciences Companies Should Know About the New Trade Fraud Task Force

September 10, 2025 | Posted by Adam M. Smith; Samantha Sewall; Topic(s): Government Regulation; International Trade; Trends and Insights

On August 29, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) launched the Trade Fraud Task Force that will coordinate efforts between DOJ’s Civil and Criminal Divisions and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to bring enforcement actions against importers who unlawfully evade tariffs and other customs duties, as well as against parties who unlawfully import prohibited goods.[1] This is the latest sign that, amid legal battles over the legality of President Trump’s tariffs, DOJ remains deeply committed to using all available legal tools to police customs and tariff compliance.  It is also the latest example of this Administration’s top-down approach to generating investigative targets.

Read More

Life Sciences Royalty Finance Trends – H1 2025

August 4, 2025 | Posted by Todd J. Trattner; Ryan A. Murr; Topic(s): Royalty Finance; Trends and Insights

The numbers for royalty financing transactions in the first half of 2025 look promising, with one commentator going so far to state, “Faced with a bleak equity market and tightening credit, drug developers from Boston to Basel turned to royalty monetization as a lifeline.” (see, https://www.p05.org/royalty-financing-rescues-biopharma-a-h1-2025-global-analysis/)

Read More

Expanded QSBS Benefits: What Biotech Founders Need to Know After the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act

July 30, 2025 | Posted by Eric B. Sloan; Matt Donnelly; Kamia Williams; Bree Gong; Topic(s): Government Regulation; Tax; Trends and Insights

Why this matters for biotech start-ups

Raising capital for drug discovery often pushes early-stage biotech companies above the gross asset limit for qualifying for the U.S. federal income tax benefits associated with qualified small business stock (“QSBS”). The law commonly referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA”), signed into law on July 4, 2025, lets founders and other investors greater access these tax savings—potentially reducing their tax bill by millions when the company is sold.

Read More

Getting Ready for Your Q2 Quarterly Reports: Trends in Biopharmaceutical Disclosures from Q1 Quarterly Reports

July 28, 2025 | Posted by Aaron K. Briggs; Branden C. Berns; Melanie E. Neary; Xuan Hong Tran; Topic(s): Government Regulation; International Trade; SEC Disclosure; Trends and Insights

Earlier this year, the new Presidential Administration introduced a series of policies, legislative proposals and regulatory actions that have impacted the business and regulatory environment and contributed to a climate of uncertainty—particularly in the biopharmaceutical sector. These developments gave companies much to address in their first quarter 10-Q filings. To shed light on how biopharmaceutical companies addressed these developments, we conducted a survey of the Q1 Quarterly Reports of the top 100 biopharmaceutical companies. Our analysis revealed that most companies are actively assessing the potential impact of these changes, with more than two-thirds (68%) of companies updating their risk factors and more than half (53%) updating their Management’s Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) accordingly. Below is a summary of the key disclosure changes, with a focus on topics of heightened relevance to the industry—including tariffs, changes in laws related to Medicaid or Medicare, federal workforce disruptions and other issues such as the Section 232 investigation and the Section 340B Drug Pricing Program.

Read More

Q2 2025: Life Sciences Capital Markets Recap

July 24, 2025 | Posted by Ryan A. Murr; Branden C. Berns; Melanie E. Neary; Topic(s): Capital Markets; Trends and Insights

Despite positive momentum in the life sciences capital markets throughout 2024 and expectations for increased favorability in both public and private investment avenues in 2025, the second quarter of 2025 continued a trend of subdued activity for the sector. As of mid-2025, life sciences companies continue to navigate a challenging financing environment, as evidenced by the statistics below and against a backdrop of the XBI and BBC both suffering moderate declines while the broader market is up 8% for the year. In the public markets, public equity capital remains scarce and issuers are heavily favoring confidential offerings to mitigate market and execution risk following key clinical read-outs. In the private markets, venture capital investors remain selective and are favoring de-risked, later-stage assets, while smaller, early-stage companies are continuing to weather an extended “biotech winter”.

Read More

Is There a Duty to Disclose FDA Feedback?

July 21, 2025 | Posted by Ryan A. Murr; Branden C. Berns; Melanie E. Neary; Topic(s): FDA

The Trustees of Welfare & Pension Funds of Local 464A – Pension Fund v. Medtronic PLC, 726 F. Supp. 3d 938 (D. Minn. 2024).

Case Highlights

On March 28, 2024, a federal district court held that positive statements about the prospect of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a company’s latest product were not sufficiently alleged to be false or misleading even though the company did not disclose that it had received a Form 483—a form issued by the FDA following an inspection that lists objectionable conditions an investigator believes violate the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and other related acts.

Read More

National Venture Capital Association Addresses “Shadow Trading” Concerns Summer Updates to Form of CDA and Model PIPE Documents

July 17, 2025 | Posted by Ryan A. Murr; Branden C. Berns; Jessica Valenzuela; Jina L. Choi; Melanie E. Neary; Topic(s): ECVC; Trends and Insights

The National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) has continued its commitment to standardizing venture financing documents by incorporating new language into its form confidential disclosure agreement (CDA) aimed at addressing the emerging “shadow trading” issue in light of the SEC v. Panuwat case. This update should help to standardize shadow trading carveouts in CDAs, which have initially varied in their adoption and have sometimes been met with resistance by counterparties based on a misunderstanding of the Panuwat holding.

Read More

Potential Impacts of Most-Favored-Nation Executive Order on Ex-US License Agreements

July 15, 2025 | Posted by Ryan A. Murr; Branden C. Berns; Melanie E. Neary; Topic(s): FDA; Government Regulation; License Agreements; Trends and Insights

Introduction

On May 12, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients”. This order aims to address the perceived imbalance where the United States funds a significant portion of global pharmaceutical profits and pays high prices, while drug manufacturers offer deep discounts to access foreign markets, subsidizing those lower prices through higher prices in the United States. The stated purpose of the Executive Order is to ensure that Americans are not forced to pay almost three times more for the same medicines and have access to the most-favored-nation (MFN) price.

Read More
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 6
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Gibson Dunn Life Sciences
2025 Outlook Webcast Series
Capital Markets: Click here to view the video recording and program materials.
Royalty Finance: Click here to view the video recording and program materials.
Read ROYALTY REPORT here.

Topics

Capital Markets

Clinical Trials

CVR Spinoff

CVRs

Delaware Law

ECVC

False Claims Act

FDA

FDA Guidance

Government Regulation

International Trade

IPOs

License Agreements

M&A

Manufacturing

Reverse Mergers

Royalty Finance

SEC Disclosure

SEC Updates

Securities Litigation

Shareholder Activism

Tax

Trends and Insights

Editors

Rachel E. Baron

Branden C. Berns

Aaron K. Briggs

Jina L. Choi

Matt Donnelly

Pamela Lawrence Endreny

Gustav W. Eyler

Hui Fang

Carlo Felizardo

Mark Goldman

Bree Gong

Charlotte Jacobsen

Jin Hee Kim

Wynne Leahy

Jeff Lombard

Jane M. Love, Ph.D.

Mary Beth Maloney

Katlin McKelvie

Ryan A. Murr

Melanie E. Neary

John D.W. Partridge

Jonathan M. Phillips

Ryan Rott

Lindsey D. Schmidt

Samantha Sewall

Sam Shapiro

Eric B. Sloan

Adam M. Smith

Karen A. Spindler

Eric J. Stock

Xuan Hong Tran

Terrell Ussing

Jessica Valenzuela

Lindsay Bernsen Wardlaw

Stephen Weissman

Kamia Williams

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Gibson Dunn Life Sciences Landing page
  • Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor
  • NVCA Model Legal Documents
  • Royalty Finance Tracker
  • Royalty Report: Royalty Finance Transactions in the Life Sciences 2020-2024
  • IPO Resource Center
  • IP Disputes and Litigation

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.