• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Biotech Briefings

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

2026 Life Sciences Industry Outlook: Capital Markets

January 13, 2026 | Posted by Branden C. Berns; Ryan A. Murr; Melanie E. Neary; Candice Johnson; Nicholas Linke; Topic(s): Capital Markets; Trends and Insights

Welcome to Part 2 of our 2026 Life Sciences Industry Outlook series. Today, we are focusing on life sciences capital markets activity in 2025 and expectations for 2026.

The life sciences equity capital markets in 2025 were defined by a stark “tale of two halves,” beginning with intense volatility that effectively shuttered deal activity. The first half of the year was marred by significant market uncertainty, particularly following the “Liberation Day” tariff announcements. This event, combined with regulatory upheaval caused major indices like the XBI and Nasdaq to slide. During this period, the capital markets lay dormant—April saw zero priced biotech IPOs and only four priced follow-on deals, three of which were registered directs.

However, the second half of 2025 witnessed a powerful rebound as markets stabilized around greater regulatory certainty and interest rate cuts supported increased investment in the sector. Data provided by Jefferies indicate that activity accelerated significantly from June through December, with 112 follow-on offerings completed in the second half compared to just 45 in the first half. The IPO market also slowly began to emerge; after a dormant second quarter, three biotech IPOs priced across the second half of the year (resulting, however, in just seven IPOs total in 2025).

The recovery in the follow-on equity market was characterized by a shift in execution strategy and strong aftermarket performance. As investor optimism reached yearly highs, companies increasingly utilized public marketing for follow-on offerings rather than relying on confidential, wall-crossed structures. Between June and December, approximately 67% of follow-ons featured a public marketing component, up from roughly 47% in the first half of the year. Approximately two-thirds of follow-on offerings were catalyst-driven, rather than opportunistic, reflecting a market where investors were willing to support development programs with tangible clinical proof and de-risked paths to commercialization. This trend suggests that while the capital “thaw” is underway, the market remains highly disciplined, rewarding companies that successfully translate scientific innovation into measurable productivity. This has been supported in part by a larger reallocation of capital out of AI and technology and back into biopharma, which has suffered from an under allocation for the past several years.

The venture capital ecosystem stayed relatively steady in 2025, with biopharma companies raising $24.6 billion as compared to $27.8 billion in 2024. Venture investment favored companies with advanced therapeutic pipelines with near-term clinical and commercial potential. Further evidencing this trend is the widening gap between aggregate investments in Seed and Series A rounds versus Series B rounds and later, with $8.7 billion invested in early stage rounds in 2025, compared to $16.0 billion in later-stage rounds.

Looking ahead to 2026, there are continued reasons for optimism. With the VIX ending the year at lower levels and the XBI finishing up 35% for 2025, the foundation for a sustained bull market in life sciences appears solid. A large IPO backlog remains poised for a greater number of public company debuts, and the increasing commonality of non-concurrent, catalyst-driven deals for larger companies suggests a return to a more normalized and robust financing environment.

Special thanks to Jefferies for contributing data regarding 2025 biotech new issuances.

Share:

Primary Sidebar

Gibson Dunn Life Sciences
2025 Outlook Webcast Series
Capital Markets: Click here to view the video recording and program materials.
Royalty Finance: Click here to view the video recording and program materials.
Read ROYALTY REPORT here.

Topics

Capital Markets

Clinical Trials

CVR Spinoff

CVRs

Delaware Law

ECVC

False Claims Act

FDA

FDA Guidance

Government Regulation

International Trade

IPOs

License Agreements

M&A

Manufacturing

Reverse Mergers

Royalty Finance

SEC Disclosure

SEC Updates

Securities Litigation

Shareholder Activism

Tax

Trends and Insights

Editors

Rachel E. Baron

Branden C. Berns

Aaron K. Briggs

Jina L. Choi

Matt Donnelly

Pamela Lawrence Endreny

Gustav W. Eyler

Hui Fang

Carlo Felizardo

Mark Goldman

Bree Gong

Charlotte Jacobsen

Candice Johnson

Jin Hee Kim

Wynne Leahy

Nicholas Linke

Jeff Lombard

Jane M. Love, Ph.D.

Mary Beth Maloney

Katlin McKelvie

Ryan A. Murr

Melanie E. Neary

John D.W. Partridge

Jonathan M. Phillips

Ryan Rott

Lindsey D. Schmidt

Samantha Sewall

Sam Shapiro

Evan Shepherd

Eric B. Sloan

Adam M. Smith

Bradley P. Smith

Karen A. Spindler

Eric J. Stock

Ayushi Sutaria

Xuan Hong Tran

Terrell Ussing

Jessica Valenzuela

Lindsay Bernsen Wardlaw

Stephen Weissman

Kamia Williams

Maggie Zhang

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Gibson Dunn Life Sciences Landing page
  • Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor
  • NVCA Model Legal Documents
  • Royalty Finance Tracker
  • Royalty Report: Royalty Finance Transactions in the Life Sciences 2020-2024
  • IPO Resource Center
  • IP Disputes and Litigation

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.